What is Australia’s Climate-related Disclosures (AASB S2)?

A Deep Dive into AASB S2: Your Comprehensive Guide to Australia's Mandatory Climate Disclosure

The ground is shifting beneath corporate Australia. A new era of transparency and accountability has begun with the introduction of a mandatory climate-related financial disclosure (CRFD) regime.

‍

It's the most significant overhaul of corporate accountability in decades. At the heart of this transformation is the AASB S2 standard, a new rulebook that fundamentally redefines the responsibilities of directors and executives.

‍

For business leaders, treating this as a simple compliance exercise would be a strategic error. The new laws move climate risk from the periphery of corporate responsibility to the very core of financial reporting and fiduciary duty. This guide provides a detailed breakdown of the AASB S2 framework, explaining what is required, who is affected, and how you can prepare your organisation for this new reality in Australia's Sustainability Reporting.

‍

What is Australia’s AASB S2?

AASB S2 Climate-related Disclosures is the mandatory standard that dictates the specific content for Australia's new climate reporting laws. Developed by the Australian Accounting Standards Board (AASB), this standard is legally enacted through amendments to the Corporations Act 2001.

‍

By embedding climate reporting within corporate law, the government has legally elevated climate-related risk to the same status as traditional financial risk. It is now an integral part of your financial reporting obligations, subject to the same oversight, legal duties, and enforcement mechanisms.

‍

The standard is closely aligned with the global benchmark set by the International Sustainability Standards Board (IFRS S2), ensuring Australian companies meet international expectations.

‍

Why is AASB S2 mandatory now?

The move from a voluntary to a mandatory system is driven by several powerful factors. Understanding these motivations provides context for the scale and seriousness of the new regime.

‍

Investor Demand

Financial markets, from large asset managers to retail investors, are demanding consistent, comparable, and reliable information on climate risks to make informed capital allocation decisions.

‍

Systemic Financial Risk

Regulators like ASIC and APRA recognize climate change as a material threat to the stability of the entire financial system. Mandatory disclosures provide the data needed to monitor and manage these economy-wide risks.

‍

Global Alignment

To remain competitive in global capital markets, Australia's regulatory environment must keep pace with international best practices. Aligning with the IFRS S2 standard creates a common language for sustainability reporting.

‍

Combating Greenwashing

By replacing unaudited claims with standardized and externally assured disclosures, the regime aims to increase accountability and reduce misleading statements about climate performance.

‍

From voluntary to legally binding

The CRFD regime marks a definitive break from the past. It replaces a fragmented system of voluntary reporting, which was often guided by the principles of the Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures (TCFD).

‍

While the new Australian standards adopt the familiar four-pillar structure of the TCFD (Governance, Strategy, Risk Management, and Metrics and Targets), they demand a much greater level of detail.

‍

The most significant change is the shift from qualitative narratives to quantitative disclosures about the financial impacts of climate risk on your company's balance sheet, income statement, and cash flows. This cements the integration of climate considerations into mainstream financial analysis.

‍

Who needs to report and when?

The legislation uses a phased implementation approach, gradually expanding the group of reporting companies over three years. This allows organisations and the wider market time to build the necessary capabilities.

‍

Understanding the phased implementation

Your company's reporting start date is determined by its size and status. The obligations are divided into three distinct groups.

‍

Group 1: The pioneers

Reporting obligations begin for financial years starting on or after January 1, 2025. Your company is in this group if it is required to report under the Corporations Act and meets one of the following criteria:

• It satisfies at least two of these three thresholds:
  
  • Consolidated revenue of $500 million or more.
  • Consolidated gross assets of $1 billion or more.
  • 500 or more employees.
• It is a controlling corporation that meets the publication threshold under the National Greenhouse and Energy Reporting Act 2007 (NGER Act).

‍

Group 2: The second wave

Reporting obligations begin for financial years starting on or after July 1, 2026. Your company falls into this group if it meets one of the following criteria:

• It satisfies at least two of these three thresholds:
  
  • Consolidated revenue of $200 million or more.
  • Consolidated gross assets of $500 million or more.
  • 250 or more employees.
• It is a controlling corporation required to report under the NGER Act (and not in Group 1).
• It is an asset owner (like a superannuation fund) with assets under management of $5 billion or more.

‍

Group 3: Completing the rollout

Reporting obligations begin for financial years starting on or after July 1, 2027. This group includes companies that meet one of the following criteria:

• It satisfies at least two of these three thresholds:
  
  • Consolidated revenue of $50 million or more.
  • Consolidated gross assets of $25 million or more.
  • 100 or more employees.

‍

Entities in this group have access to a materiality exemption. If a Group 3 company determines it has no material climate-related risks or opportunities, it can make a statement to that effect instead of preparing a full report. However, this still requires a formal assessment process to justify the conclusion.

‍

The supply chain ripple effect

Even if your company falls below these thresholds, it's unlikely you will remain unaffected.

‍

To comply with their own legal obligations for mandatory sustainability reporting in Australia, large Group 1 and Group 2 companies will be compelled to gather emissions and climate risk data from their entire value chain.

‍

This "shadow regulation" means that providing climate data will become a prerequisite for participating in the supply chains of Australia's largest corporations.

‍

Core disclosure requirements: The four pillars of AASB S2

The annual sustainability report is the centrepiece of the new regime. Its content is structured around four internationally recognized pillars.

‍

Pillar 1: Governance

This pillar requires transparency on how climate-related matters are overseen at the highest levels. Disclosures must articulate the specific roles and responsibilities of the board and its committees, detail management's role in the process, and explain how climate-related performance is factored into executive remuneration.

‍

Pillar 2: Strategy

The strategy pillar demands a forward-looking assessment of how climate change will impact your business.

‍

Identifying risks and opportunities

You must identify your material climate-related risks, categorised as physical risks (from extreme weather) or transition risks (from policy changes or new technology), and opportunities over the short, medium, and long term. The core of this section is explaining the current and anticipated financial effects on your company's business model and strategy.

‍

Mandatory scenario analysis

A critical component is climate scenario analysis. This is no longer optional; it is a mandatory strategic stress test. The law requires you to assess your strategy's resilience against at least two contrasting futures:

1. A low-warming scenario where the global temperature increase is limited to 1.5°C. This tests your business against high transition risks.
2. A high-warming scenario where the temperature increase "well exceeds" 2°C. This tests your business against severe physical risks.

‍

Pillar 3: Risk management

This pillar requires you to detail the "how" of your climate risk management processes. Disclosures must describe the specific procedures used to identify, assess, prioritise, and monitor climate-related risks. A crucial element is explaining how these processes are integrated with your organisation's overall enterprise risk management (ERM) framework.

‍

Pillar 4: Metrics and targets

The final pillar focuses on the quantitative aspects of your climate performance.

‍

Greenhouse Gas (GHG) emissions

This is one of the most significant requirements.

• Scope 1 emissions (direct) and Scope 2 emissions (from purchased energy) must be disclosed from your first year of reporting.
• Material Scope 3 emissions (all other indirect emissions in your value chain) must be disclosed from your second year onwards.

‍

Accurately quantifying Scope 3 emissions represents the greatest long-term data and operational challenge. It requires developing new systems for supplier engagement, data collection, and estimation, representing a substantial undertaking for most organisations.

‍

Other key metrics

You must also provide details about any climate-related targets and transition plans, specifying timelines, planned use of carbon credits, and how the plan will be resourced. Other required metrics include capital deployed towards climate initiatives and details of any internal carbon price used in decision-making.

‍

Compliance, Liability, and Enforcement

The Annual Sustainability Report

Climate disclosures must be presented in a new, standalone "sustainability report." This document sits alongside your Financial Report and Directors' Report and must be lodged with ASIC on the same timeline. The law also introduces a new obligation to keep detailed "sustainability records" for seven years.

‍

Mandatory assurance requirements

A cornerstone of the regime's credibility is the requirement for mandatory external assurance of the sustainability report by your financial auditor.

‍

This will be phased in, starting with limited assurance (a review level) and progressing to reasonable assurance (the same high level as a financial audit) for all disclosures for financial years commencing on or after July 1, 2030.

‍

This creates a clear imperative to build "assurance-ready" processes for climate data from day one.

‍

Directors' duties and the "safe harbour" provision

The regime places direct responsibilities on directors, who must make a declaration about the report's compliance. To address concerns about liability for forward-looking statements, the legislation includes a temporary and targeted "safe harbour" provision.

‍

For the first three years, only ASIC can initiate civil proceedings for misleading conduct related to statements about Scope 3 emissions, scenario analysis, and transition plans. This provides a shield against private litigation, such as shareholder class actions, for these specific, uncertain disclosures. However, it is not a blanket immunity; it does not protect against criminal action or regulatory action by ASIC.

‍

ASIC's role as regulator

As the primary corporate regulator, ASIC is responsible for enforcing the new regime. It has published ASIC Regulatory Guide 280, which provides detailed guidance on its expectations. While ASIC has committed to a "pragmatic and proportionate" approach in the early years, it will actively monitor reports and has the power to direct companies to correct statements it considers misleading or incomplete.

‍

Preparing your organisation for AASB S2

How Arbor can help you with AASB S2

The data-intensive nature of the new climate reporting Australia rules, especially around Scope 3 emissions and auditable metrics, presents a significant challenge. A robust carbon accounting platform is essential for efficient and reliable compliance.

‍

Arbor’s platform is designed to simplify this complexity.

• Tackling Data Complexity: We help you automate the collection and management of the vast amounts of activity data needed for accurate carbon emissions calculations, saving time and reducing error.
• Solving the Scope 3 Puzzle: Our platform specializes in product-level carbon footprints and supply chain analysis. This provides the granular data you need to tackle the difficult task of measuring and reporting Scope 3 emissions with confidence.
• Delivering Audit-Ready Data: The new rules demand external assurance. Our platform provides a clear, transparent, and auditable trail for all data and calculations, making you "assurance-ready" from the start.
• Scaling for Enterprise Needs: Arbor is built to handle thousands of SKUs and complex supply chains, making it the ideal solution for large enterprises facing these new obligations.

‍

Don't wait for your first reporting deadline to approach. The time to build your capabilities is now.

Talk to one of our experts today to see how Arbor can streamline your AASB S2 compliance journey.

‍

Summary

Australia's adoption of AASB S2 and a mandatory climate disclosure regime represents a permanent and strategic shift in corporate governance.

‍

It requires organisations to integrate climate considerations into their core financial and strategic processes with a new level of rigour.

‍

The phased implementation provides a crucial window to prepare, but the complexity of the requirements means that early action, supported by the right technology, is the key to success.

‍

The organisations that thrive will be those that embrace this regime not as a burden, but as a catalyst to build more resilient and valuable enterprises for the future.

‍

Ready for Australia's new climate regulations?

Talk to one of our carbon experts. Request a free consultation.