All carbon footprints

What’s the carbon footprint of a trekking pole?

The average trekking pole emits
0.50-2.50 kg CO₂e

Available to measure with Arbor’s platform
The carbon footprint of trekking poles ranges from approximately 0.50 to 2.50 kg CO₂e per product, highlighting the environmental impact of manufacturing and materials used. Understanding these emissions is essential for brands aiming to reduce the product-level environmental impact of sports equipment.
Why do product carbon footprints (PCFs) matter?
Carbon Equivalent Calculator

What is a trekking pole's carbon footprint equivalent to?

Using Arbor’s Carbon Equivalent Calculator, let’s see what the average a trekking pole’s carbon emissions are equivalent to, assuming an average of 1.50 kg CO2e.

How can you reduce a trekking pole's carbon footprint?

Here are 3 ways you can lower the carbon or decarbonize a trekking pole’s carbon footprint.

Sustainable Materials

Prioritize renewable and recycled raw materials for production.

Material Optimization

Switch to lightweight, durable materials to reduce manufacturing emissions.

Lightweight Design

Choose locally sourced raw materials to minimize transportation emissions.

Arbor's platform

Want to measure the carbon footprint of your trekking pole?

We make product-level carbon accounting simple, reliable, and tailored to sports equipment.

Trekking Pole
Manage
Trekking Pole
Carbon footprint
1.50 kg CO₂e
Versions & Prototypes
Versions
Carbon footprint
Trekking Pole
Active
1.50 kg CO₂e
Trekking Pole 2024
1.50 kg CO₂e
Trekking Pole 2023
1.50 kg CO₂e
Prototypes
Carbon footprint
Trekking Pole - 20% Recycled
1.50 kg CO₂e

FAQs

What is the carbon footprint of a trekking pole?

A typical trekking pole has a carbon footprint of about 1.50 kg CO2e. This estimate covers manufacturing, transportation, and disposal processes, reflecting the environmental impact of producing this outdoor gear. The range can vary from 0.50 to 2.50 kg CO2e depending on the materials and production methods used.

How much CO₂ does a trekking pole emit?

A trekking pole typically emits between 0.50 and 2.50 kg CO2e, with an average of around 1.50 kg CO2e. The exact footprint depends on the materials used and manufacturing processes, but they generally have a low environmental impact compared to larger outdoor gear.

What are the main sources of emissions from a trekking pole?

The main sources of emissions from a trekking pole include the manufacturing process, primarily the extraction of raw materials like aluminum or carbon fiber, and transportation. Manufacturing accounts for about half the footprint, with transportation contributing significantly as well. Overall, the emissions typically range from 0.50 to 2.50 kg CO2e, averaging around 1.50 kg CO2e.

How do I calculate the carbon footprint of a trekking pole?

Arbor is the best way to calculate the carbon footprint of a trekking pole, but you can also use emission factors and follow life cycle assessment standards. For example, the footprint might be around 1.50 kg CO2e, considering materials, manufacturing, and transportation. The range can vary from 0.50 to 2.50 kg CO2e depending on production specifics.

Is a trekking pole sustainable?

Trekking poles can be sustainable if made from eco-friendly materials and produced responsibly. Their carbon footprint ranges from 0.50 to 2.50 kg CO2e, with an average of 1.50 kg CO2e. Using durable, lightweight poles reduces environmental impact and promotes longer use, making them a greener choice.

How can companies reduce the carbon footprint of a trekking pole?

Companies can lower the carbon footprint of trekking poles by selecting sustainable materials like recycled aluminum or biodegradable plastics. Improving manufacturing efficiency and optimizing transportation also help. A typical trekking pole's footprint ranges from 0.50 to 2.50 kg CO2e, with an average of around 1.50 kg CO2e.

Are trekking poles bad for the environment?

Trekking poles generally have a low environmental impact, with an average carbon footprint of about 1.50 kg CO2e. However, manufacturing processes, especially for those made from metal or plastic, can contribute to habitat disruption. Choosing eco-friendly materials and brands committed to sustainability can reduce their environmental footprint.

Content Disclaimer

-------